%20(1).png)
In the dynamic world of Web3, security tokens are redefining how startups raise capital, tokenize equity, and unlock exclusive investment opportunities. These blockchain-based instruments offer groundbreaking advantages, including fractional ownership, enhanced liquidity, and borderless investor participation. However, launching a security token is far from straightforward. Success in this space requires startups to navigate complex regulatory landscapes, select the right jurisdiction, and implement robust governance mechanisms to ensure compliance and sustainability.
This guide explores the rationale behind launching a security token, how to choose the ideal jurisdiction, and the role of compliance and governance—supported but not replaced by Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)—in ensuring long-term success.
Why Launch a Security Token?
For startups in the Web3 space, security tokens offer an innovative way to rethink traditional fundraising. Unlike utility tokens, which grant access to a service or platform, security tokens represent ownership or investment rights in a company, akin to shares or bonds. Here’s why this approach is gaining traction:
Access to Global Capital: Security tokens enable startups to reach a global investor base, bypassing geographical and banking restrictions that often limit traditional fundraising efforts.
Fractional Ownership: Tokenization allows investors to purchase small, manageable portions of high-value assets, such as real estate or intellectual property, making investment opportunities more accessible.
Increased Liquidity: Listing tokens on regulated security token exchanges gives investors liquidity options that are typically unavailable in traditional equity markets.
Transparency: Built on blockchain technology, security tokens provide an immutable record of ownership and transactions, fostering trust and accountability with investors.
While the potential benefits of launching a security token are substantial, they come with regulatory obligations and risks that startups must carefully manage. Strategic planning and expert guidance are crucial for navigating this process successfully.
The Jurisdiction Hunt
Choosing the right jurisdiction is essential for startups launching a security token. The regulatory environment shapes a project’s compliance obligations, operational flexibility, and ability to attract investors. Jurisdictions with progressive blockchain policies and infrastructure provide startups with the tools they need to scale globally. Here’s an in-depth look at the leading blockchain hubs setting the benchmark for security token frameworks.
United Arab Emirates (UAE)
The UAE has emerged as a global leader in blockchain innovation, leveraging forward-thinking policies and robust regulatory frameworks to attract startups and enterprises. Its strategic location, tax incentives, and cutting-edge infrastructure make it an ideal destination for security token projects.
Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) and DFSA
The DIFC, regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), is a premier hub for blockchain businesses. The DFSA introduced its Investment Token Framework in 2021, regulating:
Security Tokens: Representing shares, bonds, warrants, or structured products.
Derivative Tokens: Encompassing options, futures, and similar instruments.
The framework ensures market integrity, investor protection, and streamlined processes for token issuance, trading, and custody. Additionally, the DIFC provides a business-friendly regulatory ecosystem, tax exemptions, and access to international markets, making it a prime choice for startups and established firms.
Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA)
VARA is the world’s first dedicated regulator for virtual assets, overseeing Dubai’s broader digital asset ecosystem. It offers tailored licensing for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), regulating activities such as token issuance, trading, custodial services, and portfolio management.
Key free zones under VARA’s jurisdiction include:
Dubai World Trade Centre (DWTC): A hub for blockchain businesses and global events.
Dubai Multi Commodities Centre (DMCC): Known for tokenized commodities and blockchain trading solutions, housing over 22,000 companies.
Meydan Free Zone: Simplified licensing processes for fintech and blockchain startups.
VARA’s initiatives focus on fostering innovation while maintaining financial stability.
Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) and FSRA
The Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM), regulated by the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA), offers a comprehensive framework for virtual assets, including security tokens. Key benefits include:
100% foreign ownership without the need for local sponsorship.
Tax incentives under a legal system based on English common law.
Access to institutional investors and a growing global network.
The FSRA ensures compliance and investor protection, offering clarity for startups integrating tokenized securities into traditional financial systems.
Regulatory Definition: Investment Tokens
Security tokens in the UAE fall under the broader category of “Investment Tokens”, which are treated as securities. These tokens are subject to the same regulatory standards as traditional securities, including compliance with the VARA, DFSA or FSRA’s guidelines for marketing, issuing, and trading. Authorized firms can also provide financial services related to investment tokens, such as discretionary portfolio management or collective investment funds.
Key Advantage
The UAE’s combination of tax benefits, a strategic location as a global trade hub, and regulatory clarity positions it as a top jurisdiction for startups focusing on scalability and innovation. Working with business setup services or international law firms with local expertise ensures startups can identify the best free zone for their operations.
Switzerland
Switzerland has solidified its reputation as a global pioneer in blockchain development through its Crypto Valley in Zug, home to some of the world’s most innovative blockchain projects. The country’s regulatory framework offers unmatched clarity, making it a favored destination for security token issuers.
Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA)
FINMA’s comprehensive guidance categorizes tokens into:
Payment Tokens: Digital currencies used for transactions.
Utility Tokens: Tokens granting access to a specific service or application.
Asset Tokens: Representing claims on equity or debt, akin to traditional securities.
This classification simplifies compliance for startups, allowing them to navigate regulatory requirements with ease.
Banking and Blockchain Ecosystem
Switzerland’s robust banking infrastructure supports blockchain innovation. Crypto-focused banks like SEBA and Sygnum provide critical services, including:
Secure storage solutions for tokens.
Insured deposits and tax reporting.
Support for token issuance and management.
These banks ensure that blockchain startups have access to financial tools tailored to their needs.
Global Reach and Stability
Swiss regulations allow for seamless global transfer of tokenized securities, granting startups access to a broader investor base. Token holders enjoy enforceable rights, such as dividends and voting privileges, which foster investor trust.
Technology-Neutral Approach
Switzerland’s regulatory framework applies the same financial market laws to both traditional and tokenized assets. The term “asset token” is used instead of “security token” to represent debt or equity claims on the issuer, promising shares in future earnings or capital flows. These tokens mirror the economic functions of traditional equities, bonds, or derivatives.
Authorization and Compliance
Issuers of asset tokens may require FINMA authorization, adherence to AML regulations, and compliance with the Swiss Financial Services Act (FinSA). FinSA ensures investor protection by mandating transparency and disclosure. Startups may qualify for exemptions, such as:
Targeting fewer than 500 investors.
Offering tokens to professional investors only.
Individual investments exceeding CHF 100,000.
Total issuance capped at CHF 8 million over 12 months.
Key Advantage
Switzerland’s unparalleled legal clarity, stable financial ecosystem, and supportive blockchain community make it a top destination for security token issuers. As the home of Ethereum’s founders, Zug exemplifies the country’s leadership in distributed ledger technology (DLT) and blockchain innovation.
Emerging Jurisdictions
Emerging jurisdictions like the Marshall Islands, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands (BVI), and El Salvador are reshaping the blockchain landscape by offering innovative legal frameworks, tax incentives, and cost-effective opportunities. These jurisdictions cater to startups aiming to launch security tokens or explore decentralized solutions, leveraging regulatory clarity and operational flexibility.
Marshall Islands
The Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) has positioned itself as a trailblazer in blockchain legislation, particularly for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs).
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Act (DAO Act)
Enacted in 2022, the DAO Act recognizes DAOs as Limited Liability Companies (DAO LLCs), providing a robust legal framework for their incorporation and operation. The structure, inspired by Delaware law, offers blockchain startups a combination of regulatory clarity and flexibility, streamlining governance processes for decentralized innovation.
Latest Developments
In 2024, the Marshall Islands introduced expanded measures to enhance the registration process for DAO LLCs and enforce stricter compliance requirements. These updates solidify the RMI’s commitment to fostering decentralized technologies and innovation in the blockchain space.
Security Token Issuance and Compliance
Currently, the Marshall Islands lacks a dedicated Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) framework. Businesses issuing security tokens must comply with the Business Corporations Act (BCA), which governs corporate entities and their ability to issue securities. Additionally, entities involved in custodial or deposit-taking token models must consider the 1987 Banking Act.
Discussions are ongoing about introducing a VASP framework, with parliamentary consideration expected in 2025.
Key Advantage
The Marshall Islands provides one of the most advanced DAO frameworks globally, making it a unique jurisdiction for blockchain startups seeking innovative legal structures. Its focus on regulatory clarity and decentralized governance positions it as a leader in DAO incorporation.
Bermuda
Bermuda has earned a reputation as a forward-thinking jurisdiction, blending regulatory innovation with a robust financial services ecosystem.
Tiered Licensing System
Under the Digital Asset Business Act (DABA), the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) offers a tiered licensing framework tailored to Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs):
Sandbox Initiatives: Enable startups to test and refine offerings within a controlled regulatory environment.
Full Licensing: Requires entities to establish robust compliance programs, including insurance, regular reporting, and adherence to AML/ATF standards.
Digital Asset Issuance Act (DAIA)
The DAIA governs the issuance of digital assets, requiring issuers to submit a detailed issuance document (akin to a prospectus) for evaluation by the BMA. Key focus areas include:
The management structure of the issuing entity.
Security measures and risk mitigation strategies.
Compliance with cybersecurity and AML/ATF regulations.
Entities offering custodial services must adhere to the Digital Asset Custody Code of Practice, ensuring the secure management of private keys and customer assets.
Key Advantage
Bermuda’s progressive regulatory framework, combined with its historical success as a quality offshore jurisdiction, makes it an ideal destination for startups looking to scale their operations. Its reputation in the insurance and cruise industries underscores its ability to attract high-caliber projects.
British Virgin Islands (BVI)
The British Virgin Islands (BVI) is a long-established hub for financial services, known for its favorable tax regime and well-defined regulatory frameworks.
Regulatory Framework
The Securities and Investment Business Act (SIBA) governs the issuance of security tokens in the BVI:
Security Tokens: Classified as securities under SIBA, subject to prospectus requirements and oversight by the Financial Services Commission (FSC).
Non-Security Tokens: Utility tokens are generally unregulated unless classified as collective investment schemes.
Virtual Assets Service Providers Act (BVI VASPA)
Effective since February 2023, the VASPA framework regulates VASPs while fostering innovation. Key features include:
Custodial services for digital assets and private keys.
Exemptions for token issuers engaged solely in proprietary activities.
Key Advantage
The BVI’s zero-tax regime and strong financial ecosystem make it a preferred choice for startups. LPO&Law, a trusted company formation agent in the BVI, works closely with numerous startups and investment funds, offering expertise in navigating the jurisdiction’s regulatory landscape.
El Salvador
El Salvador’s bold move to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender has positioned it as a rising star in the blockchain world. Its regulatory framework combines innovation with cost-efficiency, appealing to startups and Web3 projects.
Digital Asset Issuance Law (LEAD)
LEAD governs Digital Asset Service Providers (DASPs), supporting a wide range of activities, including:
Token issuance, trading, and custody.
DeFi operations and stablecoin creation.
Payment gateway and wallet services.
Cost-Efficiency and Licensing
DASPs benefit from a 0% tax regime for global operations. The licensing process, costing approximately $30,000, includes setting up a USD bank account and creating AML/KYC-compliant policies. Startups must also hire two local compliance officers for around $800/month. The process typically takes 2.5 to 5 months.
Key Advantage
El Salvador’s 0% tax regime for worldwide operations and cost-effective licensing process make it a highly economical choice for startups. Its pioneering adoption of Bitcoin as legal tender has positioned the country as a global leader in crypto innovation, attracting blockchain entrepreneurs and projects from around the world. The government’s pro-crypto stance, coupled with streamlined regulatory requirements, provides startups with a supportive environment to test, scale, and access global markets.
Compliance Obligations: A Blueprint for Startups
In the fast-paced and highly regulated world of digital assets, navigating compliance can be daunting. Yet, compliance isn’t merely a safeguard against penalties—it’s a strategic pillar for building trust, fostering innovation, and establishing a sustainable foundation for growth. Startups in the blockchain space must adopt a structured, risk-based compliance approach that aligns with their unique nature, scale, and goals.
Understanding the Foundations: Rules, Principles, and Outcomes
Compliance frameworks vary across jurisdictions, but most blend three primary approaches:
Rules-Based: Prescriptive guidelines with minimal flexibility, ensuring consistency and clarity in meeting regulatory standards.
Principles-Based: Flexible frameworks requiring contextual interpretation, allowing adaptability to diverse business models.
Outcomes-Based: Focused on achieving regulatory goals rather than prescribing methods, encouraging innovation while safeguarding compliance objectives.
For example, disclosure requirements often combine these approaches. Some jurisdictions outline explicit rules for disclosing financial performance and governance structures, while others emphasize principles of fairness and transparency, leaving startups room to determine how these goals are met.
By mastering these frameworks, startups can apply risk-based methodologies to identify vulnerabilities and design tailored compliance strategies. The cornerstone of this process is a robust risk management system that evaluates and addresses potential threats.
Starting from the Top: Governance as the Foundation
Governance serves as the backbone of a comprehensive compliance program. Startups must begin by assembling a Board of Directors or leadership team with the necessary expertise and integrity. Conducting a Fit and Proper Test—a best practice and sometimes a regulatory requirement—ensures the board’s capability and ethical standing.
Key steps to establish governance:
Develop Tailored Governance Plans: Align strategies with the startup’s scale and operational complexity.
Schedule Regular Reviews: Hold regular governance meetings to demonstrate proactive risk management and accountability.
Establish Audit and Reporting Standards: Ensure financial reports comply with standards like GAAP or IFRS, supported by regular audits to maintain financial integrity.
Pro Tip: A risk-based approach can enhance governance efficiency. By implementing the Three Lines of Defense Model, startups can assign operational teams to manage risks, compliance functions to prioritize them, and internal audits to ensure the effectiveness of these measures.
Resource Allocation: Compliance as a Strategic Asset
Far from being a cost center, compliance is a strategic enabler that fosters trust among regulators, investors, and customers. Startups should allocate resources based on their risk assessments, ensuring investments in:
Personnel: Hiring experts in regulatory compliance.
Technology: Leveraging tools for monitoring, reporting, and cybersecurity.
Processes: Streamlining workflows to meet compliance obligations effectively.
Every step of resource allocation should be meticulously documented, as transparency and clear records are critical for regulatory inspections and audits.
Mastering Compliance Obligations: A Pragmatic Approach
Compliance may feel overwhelming for startups with limited resources. To streamline efforts:
Create a Compliance Obligations Register: List all regulatory requirements and assess their impact.
Prioritize Critical Obligations: Focus on areas with significant legal or reputational risks.
Conduct a Risk Assessment: Evaluate exposure to regulatory scrutiny and allocate resources to address high-risk areas effectively.
For example, startups issuing security tokens must comply with registration laws, anti-fraud provisions, and trading restrictions. Jurisdictions like the British Virgin Islands (BVI) and Bermuda require startups to prove token compliance with securities regulations, underscoring the need for expert legal guidance.
Collaboration: Building a Resilient Ecosystem
Collaboration is a powerful tool in the crypto space, particularly in jurisdictions with nascent regulatory frameworks. Startups can benefit from forming industry groups to:
Advocate for Tailored Regulations: Collaborate with regulators to address the unique needs of blockchain businesses.
Enhance Public Trust: Demonstrate a unified commitment to ethical practices, building confidence among consumers and investors.
By fostering collaboration, startups strengthen the ecosystem, positioning themselves as industry leaders while shaping the regulatory landscape to balance innovation and accountability.
Compliance as a Catalyst for Growth
Compliance isn’t just about avoiding penalties—it’s a vehicle for sustainable growth and competitive advantage. Startups that invest in governance, resources, and collaboration can transform compliance into a strategic enabler. By embracing pragmatic, risk-based strategies and maintaining meticulous documentation, startups can navigate regulatory complexities with confidence and clarity, ensuring resilience and long-term success in the dynamic digital economy.
The Role of DAOs: Governance Automation, Not a Replacement
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as an innovative governance framework in the blockchain space, leveraging smart contracts to automate processes, enhance transparency, and foster stakeholder engagement. While DAOs offer significant efficiencies, they are not a panacea for the complexities of corporate governance, especially in regulated sectors like securities.
DAOs and Smart Contract Automation
At their core, DAOs are digital entities governed by rules encoded in smart contracts. These contracts automate key governance tasks, such as:
Voting Thresholds: Establishing rules for proposal approvals.
Fund Disbursements: Ensuring capital allocation adheres to predefined protocols.
Compliance Checks: Automating adherence to regulatory requirements.
By reducing human error and providing an immutable blockchain-based audit trail, DAOs inspire trust among regulators and stakeholders. For startups launching security tokens, DAOs simplify governance, enabling efficient and transparent compliance with investor expectations.
DAOs also democratize decision-making by empowering token holders to participate in governance, aligning an organization’s actions with the collective will of its community. This participatory model enhances stakeholder engagement and fosters a sense of shared responsibility.
Limitations of DAOs in Regulated Environments
Despite their advantages, DAOs cannot replace traditional corporate governance structures, particularly in industries subject to rigorous regulatory oversight.
Disclosure Requirements: Securities regulators mandate detailed disclosures about financial performance, material events, and risks. DAOs, by design, lack the mechanisms to fulfill such obligations comprehensively.
Fiduciary Duties: Boards of directors play a crucial role in overseeing operations and ensuring fiduciary responsibilities are met. While DAOs decentralize decision-making, they cannot eliminate the need for strategic oversight by experienced professionals.
Centralized Accountability: Regulatory authorities require identifiable entities or individuals to bear responsibility for compliance. Startups leveraging DAOs must designate clear accountability structures to satisfy legal obligations.
For instance, in Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Ooki DAO, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) pursued enforcement actions against a DAO, arguing that its decentralized structure did not absolve members from regulatory oversight. Similarly, in Sarcuni v. bZx DAO, a class-action lawsuit was filed after a security breach caused user losses. The case underscored the legal risks DAOs face when traditional governance and accountability mechanisms are absent.
These examples highlight the ongoing expectations of regulators and courts: DAOs, despite their decentralized nature, cannot evade the legal and fiduciary obligations required of traditional entities.
Myths and Realities About DAOs
As DAOs gain popularity, several misconceptions about their capabilities persist:
Myth: DAOs eliminate the need for compliance frameworks.
Reality: Compliance remains essential. DAOs enhance efficiency but cannot replace core governance elements like audit standards and disclosure protocols.
Myth: Regulators will adapt to DAOs by loosening oversight.
Reality: Regulatory bodies prioritize investor protection and market integrity, requiring DAOs to align with existing legal frameworks rather than expecting leniency.
A Complementary Framework, Not a Replacement
DAOs represent a significant evolution in governance, offering automation, transparency, and stakeholder participation. However, they should be seen as a tool to complement—not replace—traditional corporate governance. For startups in highly regulated sectors, success lies in integrating DAOs with established compliance practices. By combining the innovation of DAOs with regulatory rigor, startups can leverage the efficiencies of blockchain technology while maintaining the oversight and accountability necessary for sustainable growth. This hybrid approach ensures that organizations meet legal obligations while maximizing the benefits of decentralization.
Conclusion: Transforming Your Vision into Reality with Expert Guidance
The journey to launching a security token is a bold and complex endeavor, blending the transformative power of blockchain technology with the rigorous demands of regulatory compliance. Success in this space goes beyond innovation—it requires meticulous planning, strategic jurisdiction selection, and robust governance frameworks that inspire trust among investors and stakeholders alike.
Through this guide, we’ve explored the key elements that drive security token launches: the unparalleled potential of tokenized equity, the importance of navigating diverse regulatory landscapes, and the role of compliance and governance in ensuring operational resilience. Startups have more tools than ever to build innovative funding mechanisms, yet this comes with the responsibility to balance ambition with accountability. From leveraging the efficiencies of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) to mastering regulatory frameworks, every decision shapes the foundation of long-term success.
At Moonrock Consultancy, Pragmax Consulting, and LPO&Law, we recognize that every startup is unique, and we’re here to help you navigate these complexities with confidence. Whether you’re at the ideation stage or ready to scale globally, we provide end-to-end solutions tailored to your needs, including:
Jurisdiction Selection: Helping you choose the optimal jurisdiction that aligns with your operational goals and investor appeal.
Company Formation and By-Laws: Assisting with the creation of entities, drafting by-laws, and structuring governance frameworks.
Compliance Strategies: Designing compliance programs that adhere to securities laws, AML/ATF standards, and more.
DAO Implementation: Guiding the integration of DAOs to streamline governance while maintaining regulatory compliance.
Lifecycle Support: Providing ongoing advisory for security token issuance, trading, and sustainability.
Launching a security token isn’t just a step forward for your business—it’s an opportunity to redefine access to global capital, build investor trust, and lead in the evolving digital economy. With our comprehensive expertise, we can turn your vision into reality, ensuring every aspect of your journey is seamless, compliant, and impactful.
Let’s take your startup to the next level. Reach out today to discover how we can be your trusted partner in launching and scaling your security token initiative. Together, we’ll transform the possibilities of Web3 into a sustainable, successful future.
Learn More About Us
LPO&Law
A global leader in legal advisory, LPO&Law specializes in supporting blockchain startups with company formation, compliance strategies, and regulatory navigation across jurisdictions.
Website: www.lpoandlaw.com
Moonrock Consultancy empowers Fortune 500s and startups with innovative solutions in blockchain, marketing, strategy, and compliance. We drive growth, enable market entry, and optimize operations through tailored, data-driven strategies.
Website: www.moonrock.se
Pragmax Consulting delivers bespoke strategies in blockchain and digital assets, combining compliance expertise with practical insights to help businesses navigate and succeed in complex regulatory environments.
Website: https://www.pragmaxconsulting.com
